only two:
Be thinner
Be less fucked up.
There would be only one, but I've eaten rather a lot and done little exercise lately, and I'm struggling to fasten my jeans...
Sophie Hannah: Little Face
The blurb slightly overrates this book; I found it less of a tense psychological thriller than I'd hoped. But not rubbish, all the same. (***)
William Boyd: Restless
easy, brainless, entertaining holiday read (****)
Ken Thompson: No Nettles Required: The Reassuring Truth About Wildlife Gardening
Brilliant book. Informative, and occasionally side-splittingly funny. I shall need to dig a pond, though... (****)
"Banksy": Wall and Piece
Can you put an art book on a reading list?? These are great images. Banksy has a unique sense of humour. (****)
Sara Paretsky: Fire Sale
I love the Warshawski novels. Completely against type (for me) and you wouldn't ever mistake them for *literature* exactly, but they're ace. (***)
Anita Shreve: A Wedding in December
This gets mixed reviews on Amazon. I enjoyed it; but you have to appreciate Shreve's focus on the minutiae (***)
John Irving: Until I Find You
This is wonderful; I love John Irving anyway, but this is hauntingly powerful and very very funny. And also talks about the Halifax disaster which features in the Shreve book I read just before?! (*****)
Carlos Ruiz Zafon: The Shadow of the Wind
This is the second Richard & Judy Bookclub book I've read this year, which is a bit worrying. But, like the first, I really enjoyed it! A right good mystery... (****)
Anthony Doerr: About Grace
This is my broken night book. Interesting concept, very well explored. (****)
Louis De Bernieres: Birds Without Wings
Overly long and disjointed, I thought. Lots of disparate threads of narrative intertwined, and not enough of them were sufficiently gripping. Slightly disturbing portrayal of women characters. (**)
Kate Atkinson: Case Histories
Struggling to get into this, but sissy likes it. (***)
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie: Purple Hibiscus
A moving and disturbing insight into Nigerian culture (****)
Jonathan Bate: The Cure for Love
Interesting idea, rather ploddingly exlored. (***)
Martha O'Connor: Bitch Goddess Notebook
A bit *too* much like Secret History. But not bad, all the same. (****)
only two:
Be thinner
Be less fucked up.
There would be only one, but I've eaten rather a lot and done little exercise lately, and I'm struggling to fasten my jeans...
Posted by Silver Lining on Tuesday, January 02, 2007 at 04:42 PM in overview | Permalink | Comments (4)
My stepsister has quit her shitty London teaching job, and gone travelling around Latin America. She sends round robin emails home, but before she left made us all sign up to WAYN.com (or possibly .co.uk, I dunno) which is some bizarre little website that lets you plan trips abroad and send round robin emails when you get there.
WAYN keep sending me lists of people planning to visit my home location. So now I have an inbox full of lists of 19 year old people planning to come to Warwickshire to study. I KNOW, ALREADY! LEAVE ME ALONE! Somebody make it stop...
I have added a kitten to the domestic mix. Smudge. He turned out to be a she, so the neutering will be more expensive than I might have liked - but even more essential. Though Daisy has plans to the contrary... "If Smudge has babies, there can be one for Dan, one for Moo and one for me!"... So that's a massive maternal vote for the neutering, then.
Smudge's role in life is twofold. Primarily, she is for keeping down the rats that everyone tells me will live under the decking. I have a lot of decking. Secondarily, she is for giving Jip some grief. Jip is only marginally convinced Smudge isn't dinner. Smudge isn't at all convinced Jip isn't dinner. In fact, so convinced is Smudge that Jip and dinner are somehow linked, that she defies the conventional wisdom that cats are picky eaters, and steals Jip's dinner. This is funny. Jip is a dog with an attitude problem. In brief, cross her and she bites. Hard. Jip is one bite (of me) away from a one way trip to the vet's. The vet agrees. That is how much of an attitude problem Jip has. Yet you could almost swear she's afraid of this small, grey and white bundle of 6 week old mischief. Smudge will fearlessly put her tiny, crushable head alongside Jip's in Jip's bowl, and steal the tastiest morsels of food. And Jip's lips go back and she snarls and snickers and snaps, but Smudge carries on regardless. If Jip's teeth get too close to Smudge's head for comfort, Smudge removes herself from the foodbowl, walks round the back of the dog, wraps herself round Jip's back leg and chews on her hock. It's a very effective lesson, and I wonder why I didn't think of it first!
A Friday 13th disaster at work, involving messed around joins in an Access query resulting in reports excluding about 60% of their subject meant that I had a thoroughly stressed and sleepless night on Friday, and spent Saturday in the office fixing the problem (I hope). Which means I'm slightly anticipatory about going into work, tomorrow. The big cheeses may be unhappy. I hope I've done enough to put it right, but we will see, I guess...
Posted by Silver Lining on Sunday, October 15, 2006 at 08:17 PM in overview, Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (5)
I discovered last night that the husband of a dear friend died suddenly last week. His funeral was yesterday, and I knew nothing about it. It has been a weepy day.
I'm stalled at work, too. I seem to have grasped the logic of the Data Warehouse project, without having retained any of the technical know-how. I am struggling to build basic blocks of my D-Cubes, and can't even remember how to define parent/child relationships in a D-List. Not helped by the fact that I left my training manual at home.... the tribulations of working in both home and office!
Lovely boss made her first foray into work from maternity leave today, so the professional regime is a-changing. Didn't stop them turning down my request for a holiday, though...
I brought my recalcitrant D-Links home to work on; I have queried the student records database through an ODBC link, so I know I have the correct dataset - but how to set it up correctly? And am I re-inventing the wheel? I want the warehouse to map the relationship between courses and departments; but the student records database already does that. Why am I worrying about remembering parent and child rules?
Because tomorrow I have to spend time with the tech who has been assigned to me. They can't like the poor guy very much, to want to try his patience like that! It's about time I pulled my weight on this project by doing more than refining the spec. of it... frankly.
Mum gave me a Victorian dolls' dinner service at the weekend. I looked it up on the interweb. Turns out it's quite special. Now I need to find something in which to display it. Favourite online furniture shopping sites, anyone?
Posted by Silver Lining on Tuesday, October 10, 2006 at 10:06 PM in Mood, overview, Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (1)
The shape of my morning...
Daisy woke me at 7ish, for a cuddle. Daisy cuddles are intense, and she said something very wise which I've been holding onto all day, but now I want it, I've forgotten again. Got up, went downstairs for tea, took bread out of machine. Fetched food for kitten. Got dressed. Policed Dan's use of PSP, ensured water bottles, book bags, homework diaries, snacks were in the right school bags. Cleared up childrens' breakfast. Washed up yesterday's breakfast which didn't make it through the dishwasher properly. Made my lunch. Checked data for continuation analysis, packed briefcase.
Took children to school; discussed football (which I know nothing about) with Dan.
Dashed into Sainsbury's donughts, eggs, birthday cake (Bart Simpson, with chalboard and writing icing).
Work; fell up the final stair of the flight - silly pointy toe caught in hem of silly wide trousers. Bruised knee, grazed wrist, dented ego. Resolved enrolment issues for new cohort of Distance Learning corporately sponsored students. Looked into how I'm going to balance funding budget (£45m, no pressure) through HESES re-creation site. Wandered over to ITS with donughts and worked on Data Warehouse. Realised it was the end of the afternoon, and all I'd eaten all day was a couple of donughts.
Came home, cooked courgette-pasta-souffle thing.
Bemoaned stupid sore wrist.
Learnt to play chess.
I need to make more time for myself....
Posted by Silver Lining on Thursday, September 21, 2006 at 09:03 PM in overview | Permalink | Comments (3)
A long time ago, now, I used to own and run my own company. Last year, when PH moved out and I needed to earn a more reliable income, I sold it.
Just for the sake of context, the company sold environmentally friendly baby-related stuff. Cloth nappies, cloth breast pads, nipple cream, traditional slings, that sort of thing.
All my children have been breastfed. Moo was born at University, and I simply couldn't afford formula so she had to breastfeed or starve. Fortunately, we both took to it like ducks to water, and I was such a milch cow I donated huge amounts of surplus milk to the Special Care Baby Unit, too. At that time, I was heavily involved with the Baby Milk Action Coalition who campaign for ethical marketing of baby milk formulae. At that time, it was normal for mothers to be given samples of brands of formula milk in the postnatal wards. By the time they'd used up the samples, their own breast milk had dried up, and they effectively had no choice as to how to feed babies. Largely due to campaigning work by the WHO, and an international network of which BMAC is part, it was ruled unethical for formula milk to be marketed or promoted in maternity units, and there was a huge upswing in information, support and campaigning for breastfeeding.
Just to be clear; I have nothing against bottle feeding - but I am in favour of informed choices in all areas of life. Formula milk is a *substitute* for breast milk, which is the easiest, cheapest and most natural form of sustenance for babies. However, breastfeeding isn't for everyone - sometimes it's not possible, and sometimes it's not convenient and I don't think any parent should be condemned for their chosen feeding method.
BMAC still organise the Nestle boycott, which I still support keenly. It's not the point of this post, so please do follow the link to find out more about it, and consider joining - it's very easy to boycott Nestle, and despite their claims I believe it *does* have an effect - if only in getting your friends and family talking and thinking about the issues.
So, the point of all this is that the new owner of my business has written to me this morning. Recently, the Scottish Assembly passed a law making it illegal to ask a breastfeeding woman to move. This may seem like something and nothing if you've never experienced it, or never thought about it. But consider this. You have a small child. You're shopping. Your baby is hungry. You breastfeed. The baby's crying becomes more and more insistent. You lift your top, tuck baby underneath it, and there you go. The baby's feeding. Now, I've done this in shopping centres, supermarkets, beaches, Ikea cafes, bus stops, on trains, in buses, walking through the University, at work, at home, at toddler groups - in short wherever I've happened to be. Because I'm calm and confident about it, not in the least hesitant, and all my babies have been easy and eager feeders, I would guess that only about 10% of the people around me have even noticed what I'm doing. Breastfeeding needn't involve exposure of flesh - you're never going to see a naked nipple because (go figure) it's in the baby's mouth! Yet I know several women, and have heard of scores more, who have done just this - popped their baby's head under their t-shirt - and been approached by a member of staff or another member of the public and asked to go and feed their baby in the toilet.
Think about that for a minute. How many public toilets have you visited recently that have been really clean? *Really* clean. How many public toilets would you eat your dinner in?
Yet feeding women are constantly asked to take their tiny babies - with immature immune systems - and feed them in the toilet. Cramped, dirty, nowhere to sit, nothing to support their back or the arm holding the baby. Why the hell should they?
It is the exception for public places to provide comfortable, clean areas for breastfeeding in. Even baby changing rooms often don't have a chair, or a privately screened area, or anything other than a fold-up plastic baby-sized shelf.
So, having a law which gives breastfeeding women equal rights with bottle feeding parents is really quite significant. After all, you can sit down and pop a bottle into a baby's mouth *anywhere*.
Well, there's now a campaign to put pressure on the English government to do the same thing. And there's a petition. And it's online. Can we all see where this is going?! OK, so if anything I've said here struck any resonance with you at all, then go here and sign the petition. Please. And if you doubt at all the truth of anything I've said above, then look at this website, run by the campaign group organising the petition, and read the letter labelled 'response' in the box in the top right hand corner. Absolutely breathtaking!
Thank you. I'll revert to trivia, now.
Posted by Silver Lining on Sunday, April 03, 2005 at 01:22 PM in Environmental, Kids' stuff, overview | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)
Not much to say today, so here's another snippet.
I went to boarding school. A distinctly second rate girls' school in what used to be a sleepy market town in the heart of Kent. Since transformed into a major international hub, thanks to the Tunnel. But that's by the by. The school had aspirations to be up there with the Benendens and the Roedeans of the world, but it simply didn't attract the right kind of alpha female. Instead, they got girls like me.
I must have been six or seven when I first started. It was very exciting, initially. I remember looking at prospectuses, and I think we looked round another school as well as this one. I preferred the other, I'm sure I preferred the other. But this is the one I went to.
My Dad was in the army, when I was little. He was posted abroad for most of my childhood. I wanted to go to exotic places. I had my eye on Hong Kong, maybe back to Africa (we were there when I was a baby), Cyprus would have been nice. Instead, we spent my childhood dotting around the Ruhr valley in Germany. I'm sure now, with the wisdom of my thirty-some years that one army base would have proved much like another. But Germany still feels doughy and dull compared to the places we weren't posted to.
Anyway, my parents thought that boarding school would at least give me a consistent education; they could retain some control of academic quality, and not be reliant on the patchy inconsistency of the British Army Schools which were well, patchy and inconsistent at best. My Dad would have loved to have been sent to England to boarding school as a boy; but he stayed in Kenya while his younger brother got to come 'home' to the UK for his education. My mother thought that a good education was worth the sacrifice of sending me away.
When I first went to school, I was in the junior house. There weren't so many junior boarders, and we all lived in the one house. 5 dormitories, I think. With six or seven girls in each. We were little girls. I guess in theory we ranged in age from 5 to 11 years. Bridge House was a sizeable bay fronted, white detached house facing directly onto the pavement of the public road that ran through the school premises. It had a big green front door. And at the back, it had an annex which housed the kitchen and dining room/hall. We only lived in this house. The school buildings were separate, up the way a bit. You got there through the back door, which opened onto a *huge* two tiered lawned area. It should have been a field, but it was immaculately kept. There was a tarmac playground at the back of the house, with a climbing frame and a wendy house; and a path that ran all round the sides of it. Close to the house there were a couple of trees. I remember one being low enough to be easily climbed, so I suppose it was an apple tree. And there was a monkey puzzle, too. Then the field, which was framed along the left hand side by tennis courts, and along the right by the headmistress's house, and a huge, high holly hedge. At the top of the field was another row of trees, and a path. You turned right to get to the school buildings, and left to go down to the River Stour through a disused vegetable garden and some sheds which, years later, would serve excellent purpose as smoking shelters.
We had a housemistress, Miss Brierley, and a matron, whose name escapes me but she was a weak, ineffectual blonde woman. I think she probably had a good heart, but she simply wasn't up to us. Miss Brierley was another matter altogether. She was draconian. A real victorian martinet. She had long, grey hair which she wore in a tightly coiled, plaited bun. Never trust a woman who's anal enough to plait her bun. I remember her dressed all in grey, too; grey skirts, white blouses, grey or black cardigans or quite possibly jackets, american tan tights and flat black shoes. She was the closest personification I have ever encountered to the Brothers Grimm's wicked witches. She was Strict.
I don't remember our uniform. At least, I remember the senior school uniform clearly. But when I think of the junior school I have a blank. But we wore it all the time - full uniform for school, Monday to Friday, and then on weekends, we wore full uniform from the waist up, with blue corduroy trousers. Mostly I remember Miss Brierley. She was *so* strict. Let me think.
When we sat down, no matter where, we had to sit up straight. It wasn't left at that. Let me define straight. Sit down. Now, lift your back away from the back of the chair. Good. Spine straight, shoulders back, chin out. Good. Put both feet flat on the floor. Now, place your ankles and your knees together. Excellent. Hands in your lap. Good. No, it's not comfortable. It becomes more uncomfortable. Possibly because it's not a natural way to sit. Nonetheless. That's how you will sit, because any other way is unladylike. You must *not*, under any circumstances cross your legs. Not even at the ankle. If you do, Miss Brierley descends with the wrath of the Medusa, and you bloody well won't cross them again. So, now you're sitting let's consider etiquette. Cup of tea? Lovely, don't mind if I do. Sugar? Yes, please. No more than two spoonfuls, though. AND. WHAT. ARE. YOU. DOING???
What do you mean, stirring your cup in that ungainly way? No more than two circuits of the spoon round the cup, anything more than that is excessive and undignified. And the spoon must not touch the sides or bottom of the cup at all while you're stirring. Otherwise, the cup will be removed, and you will not have tea. No talking at the table, unless you're asking for something to be passed. Your arm must not rest on the table at any point of the meal. You eat with your elbows tucked into your ribs. What do you mean, you can't cut the beef like that? Never mind that it's the texture and consistency of old shoe leather; tuck your elbows in or lose your meal. Knife and fork down on the plate between mouthfuls. Chew thoroughly. Hands in lap. Breaches of etiquette, if spotted, will result in no dessert (not always such a punishment as it might have been). Or simply a summary end to your meal, altogether.
Similarly, at night, there was no talking after lights out. None. Simply not up for negotiation. One night, Charlotte Bannister and I were 'caught talking'. She had had a nightmare and I had asked if she was ok, or vice versa. Anyway, we were both told to take our mattresses and go and sleep downstairs. Into the bay fronted common room, we were ushered. There were no curtains, so the moonlight and streetlamps shone in on us. There was a pub next door, and at some point it was chucking out time. People passed noisily by. We imagined them peering through the windows, snarling and drooling and rubbing their hands. I'm sure they didn't; they were only people. But we were terrified.
Miss Brierley only lasted a year. I don't know if that was always the plan, but she started at the same time as me, and when I came back for my second year, she was gone. I can't remember who replaced her, either, although I must have lived with the replacement for more like 4 or 5 years. Of my early years at school, there's only Miss Brierley who's stuck in my mind.
We had little contact with home. Contact wasn't so easy, when I was a child, anyway. We wrote letters every Sunday morning, after church. The letters were read by matron before they were sent; ostensibly to check the spelling and make sure something of some quality was being said. But it wasn't uncommon for us to be told to change things. We were allowed to visit home at half term, and for two weekends (exeats) during each term. One of these was a fixed weekend. The other, we could organise at our discretion. At half term, and for fixed weekend, everyone had to go. Even the "abroads" couldn't stay in school. I went to Granny and Grumpy for most of those, occasionally taking a friend - usually another "abroad" - with me. From which you may gather that there was a hierarchy within the girls at school.
Day girls were a special case. We all scorned them. Day bugs. But amongst the boarders, perversely, the girls whose parents lived in the UK were top of the tree. This, I think, was because their parents could come by and visit, and because they got better parcels. They had treats throughout the term, whereas the "abroads" had to eke out what they could bring back at the beginning of term and after exeats. It was theoretically possible for parents to visit at school, during weekends. I remember girls whose parents would pull up in the car park, and take their daughter out for lunch on a Saturday. I think you could legally do that twice a term, but if you were an "abroad", exemption would be made and you could go out with your parents more often if they happened to be around.
Dad was in the UK from time to time, Mum less so. But they never came to see me; I think they thought it would be disruptive and it would take me too much time to get over them coming and then going again. In fact, I found it incredibly painful to know they had been so close and I hadn't seen them. I can well remember the physical pain of homesickness. The hollow in my chest on a cold, winter's day, having read a letter from Mum over breakfast. I remember walking up the path to school, looking at the high holly hedge, and picturing instead Mum, Dad and Sissy having breakfast at home. Picturing how the kitchen would look, smelling the aromas of home, knowing they'd be going about their daily routines. Without me. And I was walking up the path to school, looking at a high holly hedge. Without them.
Granny always used to buy me extra sweets when Dad had been to visit. I don't think he ever knew. She'd send me boxes of Newberry Fruits, or paper bags filled with quarters of whatever she thought I'd think were delicious. They'd appear unexpectedly with a little note from her, saying Dad had left them. I knew they came from her really. She was my big champion, was Granny.
Anyway, so the hierarchy was topped by the "homes". Then there were "abroads" who had relatives nearby, and somewhere to go for exeats. I was one of those. Then there were "abroads" who came from so far away that they didn't have anyone in the UK. They had nowhere to go for exeats. Nonetheless they had to go *somewhere*. They weren't allowed to stay in school. So they were entirely dependent on the friendship of a "home" or another "abroad" to save them from humiliation and disgrace. The worst case scenario was Miss Brierley ringing up your parent or guardian and asking them to take an "abroad" for the weekend as an act of charity. That's what was so iniquitous about this hierarchy - it was ruled by the terror of impermanence and the cattiness of small girls' friendships.
At the end of each term, the "homes" would go home after school on the last day. Their parents would come and pick them up, and the car park would be full of estate cars being loaded with trunks and suitcases (one trunk and no more than two suitcases per girl); squeals of delight, cawing parental laughter; sober conversations between parents and house mistress; girls promising to write, to keep in touch, to still be best friends when they got back; girls showing off the new puppy acquired since the last holiday; big brothers. Big brothers! Wow! Boys were very alien.
The "abroads" wouldn't go home until the next day, though. Trunks would be left at school. I think my trunk was stored at school from when I started to when I left, the best part of 10 years later, although that can't possibly be right; it must have come home at some point. Its contents certainly changed! Anyhow, we would be escorted, two suitcases apiece, to the station where we would be put on a train to London, accompanied by a member of staff. Usually matron. She would then sign us over, at Charing Cross Station, to Universal Aunts who would take us to our respective destinations.
Posted by Silver Lining on Saturday, March 12, 2005 at 12:49 PM in overview | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
It's been on my mind for some time to write about my family history - snippets here and there, perhaps. And now, by coincidence, my sponsor has asked me to think about this very thing. Here's as good a place as any to work out what's important and what's not. So, from time to time, this category will be used to collect, collate and gather my thoughts.
I'm going to start with my grandfather. He's been around a lot lately, one way and another. Footsteps on the landing, echoes in other places.
He was a character, my grandfather. I can't say I ever knew him particularly well, but by the time I got to know him at all he was already an old man. I like to think it was me who christened him Grumpy. Certainly it's only my sister and I who called him that.
When I was a little girl, first at boarding school, probably aged about 6 or 7, I used to go to Granny and Grumpy's for exeat weekends. Twice a term, we had exeats. And thence I would go. To Ticehurst in E. Sussex. They lived together, then, in the Old Vicarage which is now a home of some sort, I believe. It was a huge house. I remember an imposing entrance hall, with a balcony landing (though that may well be wrong) and a staircase sweeping down the right hand side. Grumpy had a study to the left of the hall, and it was very much a private room - intrusions were not welcomed and there was a thrill of naughtiness with every step across the threshold. He was away a lot; it was mostly Granny I was visiting. I suspect he may only have been in his 50s or early 60s then, and may well have been in Kenya. But he may equally have been much younger and visiting a girlfriend.
Anyway, the study had all sorts of things in it which thrilled and chilled in equal measure. A tiger skin rug with the snarling head of the beast. I remember its teeth and the roughness of its tongue and the distinctly odd look of its glass eyes. Let me be clear; this was a real tiger. It had been shot. I doubt it had been shot by Grumpy himself, although it's possible; but I suspect his father, the General, was the real culprit. There was a stool made from an elephant's foot. Surprisingly bristly, and the toenails were slightly cracked. Poor elephant. A letter opener made from what can only have been a very newly hatched crocodile. There were other things, too. I vaguely remember a zebra rug somewhere in the house, but I think that might have been the living room. There were a trio of stools, all very low, three legged and intricately beaded. They were tribal elders' stools, and only men were allowed to sit on them; Grumpy would become irate - a bellowing, roaring, tower of wrath - if a female bottom were ever found in the vicinity of the stools. Granny used to let me sit on the floor and use them as a table on which to balance my tea . I don't know if he knew. They will have been tribal and from what I learnt of him later they will have had great ceremonial significance. I can only guess at the tribe (I'd guess either Kikuyu or Masai); and I won't even stab at the significance.
I remember Grumpy smoking a pipe. Later, he was vehemently anti-smoking and until recently I was quite sure I must have made this up, but it turns out he may have smoked as a younger man.
The General, Grumpy and my father were all given the same forename. So, to distinguish t'other from which, they used others. The General was always referred to as the General (whether to his face or not I have no idea, since he was long dead when I came along). Grumpy became Bill and my father was Shuki.
As I say, I didn't know him well, but he's an imposing presence in my life nonetheless. I used to dine out on stories of my-grandfather-the-eccentric. And indeed he was, in later years. But he was so much more than that, first.
He grew up in India. The General was an officer in the British Army and we have pictures of elephant races at the Raja's palace; stories of tiger hunting (hence the skin); and so on. I say Grumpy grew up there, but in fact he was sent 'home' to England, to boarding school, at a fairly early age. Preparatory school, I should imagine. I *think* his mother, Ducky, returned to England too, to be with him, which shows an element of feminine warmth which, sadly, wouldn't be a prevailing theme in his life. He certainly went on to Cambridge where he studied medicine, and at some point, obviously, he qualified as a doctor. I have an obituary from the British Medical Journal, somewhere, which details all this stuff.
He became interested in vaccination, generally, and tuberculosis in particular, and TB was to be the theme of his working life. He was, I believe, an extremely good doctor. I don't think he ever confused himself with god; and he had a true compassion and generosity of spirit - although he hid it well beneath a gruff exterior. He was passionate about the things he believed in and, although I have no idea what his politics were, I think back and see a true small L liberal in many of the actions I know about.
His first wife, my biological grandmother, was a society debutante. I'm not sure that her parents altogether approved of the match, but since he was her second husband they perhaps didn't have much choice. I think she hoped for a continuation of her glamorous life on the London social scene with her dashing doctor husband - see how I'm romanticising this? - but he was always restless, and they moved to East Africa, where he travelled about, a kind of itinerant GP, educating and encouraging vaccination programmes, and administering the needle regularly. This was about the time of the White Mischief film, and my father has memories - albeit dim - of many of the characters on the edges of that story. There was a large British colonial community in Kenya at the time, and my family was in Nakuru. One of Grumpy's sisters was a teacher at a British girls' school (in Nairobi, I think), and remains famous amongst its increasingly aged alumni. My grandmother was alone often. I imagine a big house; I know there were staff - at least a cook and a house boy and probably a garden boy too; and an ayah for the children of whom there would eventually be two.
There are many stories from this time, most of which I am only half conscious of. A tale in the BMJ obituary of Grumpy curing a remote village of the plague by offering a shilling for every rat tail he was brought. This simple remedy earned him the soubriquet of 'the rat doctor' and many years later my uncle would be dining with members of the Kenyan government, to find that the minister he was seated next to was a child in the village at that time and remembered Grumpy as something of a legend. He is also reputed to have treated Jomo Kenyatta in prison during the time of the Mau Mau uprising. He was certainly well regarded in Kenya, and returned there often even much later in his life.
I've read a story, too, about a plane crash in the Sahara desert. At some time after Grumpy's death, Dad briefly had his papers - letters, diaries, newspaper clippings. The plane had been flying - where? Across Africa? From the UK? I don't remember. But it must have been in the early days of long(ish) distance flight. And it crashed in the Sahara. There was the pilot, Grumpy, another man and a woman who was a journalist, I think. They had to wait 3 or 4 days for rescue, using the plane for shelter and carefully rationing the water and biscuits they had.
All very exciting, but always without my grandmother. It's not surprising she fell in love with someone else, really. I'll come back to this, but it is one of the abiding sadnesses of my family history that she left my father, his brother and their father and wasn't seen again until I was nearly an adult. I grew up thinking she was to blame for running off. It turns out, inevitably, not to have been so simple, and blame if it is appropriate at all, should probably be fairly evenly apportioned amongst the adults who were then involved, and who became involved in the following couple of years.
Anyway, Grumpy remarried and his new wife (Granny) brought two of her own children to the family. And then between them they had two more.
I run out of stories for a long time, now. Until Ticehurst, in fact. When they came back to England my father was already an adult, all bar the shouting. He grew up and was educated in Kenya, and came to live in England when he was 18.
At some point, after my visits to Ticehurst had been going on for a number of years, I think, Grumpy left Granny. This made for a very complicated life. She couldn't forgive him, and the entire family tied itself in knots to keep from her the fact that we had all stayed in touch with him. This is probably something else to come back to.
Grumpy lived with his girlfriend, who shared the same name as his first wife (although as a child, I didn't know this - being only dimly aware of a first wife). As a teenager, I visited them at exeats, too, and lied to Granny about where I was going. In retirement, Grumpy became almost deliberately eccentric, and although he was extremely good company, he was also good story fodder. His partner's brother was a farmer, and kept sheep and cows. At some point, Grumpy took on a lamb who had been born with a twisted neck so that it looked permanently over one shoulder and could only walk in circles. It was destined not to live long, but under Grumpy's shelter it lived well for a few years. It was called Sheepy and it was joined by a friend - Boyo. Grumpy used to walk them on leads; Sheepy making circular progress down the lane and Boyo bounding. A sheep is a surprisingly strong animal, you know - not easy to train to leash! After a bout of shingles, Grumpy was increasingly inclined to dress in a kikoy (an East African sarong) or an old skirt of his partner's. This was later topped by a jumper knitted from wool shorn from the sheep. The jumper was always decorated with bits of twig and sheep shit - whether from hedgerow adventures or because he didn't wash the wool before he spun it was never entirely clear, but the latter makes for a better yarn (groan. Sorry).
He was passionate about things. I was a child, and later a truly self obsessed teenager, and I deeply regret that I don't know much about the things about which he was impassioned. He bought some woodland (because he thought a road was going to be built through it) and he and his partner discovered badger setts and spent many summer evenings in a shed they built there, watching badgers and drinking wine. I later planted a tree there, with a poem buried at the roots, to celebrate Moo's birth, and Grumpy used to give me updates on its growth. He loved his sheep - at one stage, Boyo had foot rot and Grumpy made him a set of leather wellies to keep his hoofs dry while they recovered. Later, he also loved his cat, McCafferty, and a family of ducks who used to court bereavement by nesting in the patio pot just a whisker's twitch away from McCafferty's bed the other side of the porch door.
He also loved women - often too well. But most of all, he loved his children. And it is another defining sadness of my family that he was almost entirely unable to express that love by any means other than gruffness. He bore a great burden of guilt for separating his sons from their mother; a guilt which he tried to alleviate towards the end of his life by making contact with her to make amends. Sadly, I think he caused as much damage to his (and her) later children as he repaired for their earlier ones. I'm not sure that, living, he ever told his sons how much he loved them, although he wrote it down in a letter they received after his death.
He was a difficult, I should think almost an impossible man to live with. Opinionated, stubborn, strong-willed, intelligent and downright ornery. But I never had to live with him, and he's been with me often, in the last few years, and I have felt his strength and his humour and his wisdom, and I have been grateful for them all.
Posted by Silver Lining on Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 10:35 PM in overview | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Coming away from school this morning, I was wondering how it is that everybody else's babies are so very much smaller than my baby. And then it hit me. It's because everybody else's babies *are* babies. You know, really-o truly-o actual babies who won't start school for at least another 2 years. Whereas *my* baby is 5. And at school. And actually not a baby at all, but - as she puts it herself - a "big gel".
The thing is, she isn't. Big, that is. She's a petite little thing, with enormous eyes and satisfyingly round cheeks. She *looks* like a baby. But she's always been very old. She was born aged about 92, and has gone on from there, spreading her particular brand of wisdom and insight around her.
This evening, while I was lying in my very hot bath after my run, and after the small people had technically had their stories and gone to bed, she appeared round the bathroom door, all wide eyes and shy smiles.
"Why do you have such a deep bath, Mummy?"
"Because I'm bigger than you are"
"Can I have a bath deep like yours tomorrow? I can stretch over the water now, you know"
And so she can.
Then she perched herself on the toilet and looked at me out of the corner of her eyes, obviously basking in the twin pleasures of naughtily being up after bedtime; and watching Mummy doing Mummy stuff. And she rinsed bubbles off my shoulders, and passed me the sponge, and handed me a warm towel off the radiator when I was ready to get out.
I well remember this; I grew up in a family where entertaining on a grand scale was the norm. When I was very little - a bit older than Daisy, perhaps, but still quite little - it wasn't uncommon for my parents to go to dinner parties in full black tie. I used to be allowed to lie quietly on Mum's bed, and watch her get ready to go out. A ball gown is a fantastically exotic thing. It needs all kinds of special preparations: boned underwear; a special ritual for talc and scent; a new 24 hour girdle (surely I'm not the only person whose mother wore those?!). I used to love watching Mum going through the ritual of preparation. Make up on before the dress. Stepping into the dress and pulling it up. I'd be allowed to do the zip for her, and breathe in the heady concoction of talc, scent and hairspray. I'd get a little squirt of Chanel No. 5 on my neck and if I was *really* good, a dab of lipstick once the dress was on and the jewellery fastened.
And always, always a twin pleasure: first, the promise that one day I too would be a grownup lady and get to dress up like a princess and go out to dinner parties; and secondly, the knowledge that in half an hour, twenty minutes, ten minutes, Mum and Dad would be gone and in there place would be left a gullible and easily manipulated babysitter, who would be easily persuaded that I was *always* allowed to stay up till 10pm to play Ludo; and who would become instantly deaf once her boyfriend arrived, and would *never* hear me sneaking around upstairs, playing with Mum's makeup and practising for my own princess days.
Now that I am a grownup lady, of course, my going out preparations consist largely of a clean pair of jeans and a dab of mascara, if I'm making a *real* effort. So poor Daisy doesn't get all that ritual stuff. But it was obvious, watching her oddly grownup babyface in the bathroom this evening, that the pleasure of watching Mummy doing what Mummies do hasn't diluted down the years.
So this evening, I let my baby stay up till big gel's bedtime, to revel in magic and shared girlie intimacies. And then I tucked her in and gave her an extra precious kiss for being my baby. Even if she is a bit older than everyone else's.
Posted by Silver Lining on Monday, February 21, 2005 at 09:45 PM in Kids' stuff, Mood, overview | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I know what I'm seeing is something familiar, but the shapes keep tumbling and shifting and I can't quite make out what it is.
PH adopted Moo when Dan was born. Her own dad only knew her briefly. To make a long story very short: we were very young; we both handled things badly; things were said which shouldn't have been; he wasn't involved with her.
Shapeshift. Look at the pretty colours! For the last couple of days, Moo has been brooding, and unusually scathing about PH. I thought it was just that she'd seen him at the weekend and he'd done that being honest thing with her.
Tumble. Turns out, he's decided it would be a good idea for her to get in touch with her real father. He's got the address. He thinks she should contact him. But he thinks it's really important that I'm not involved - her real father (let's call him W) is probably still raw from everything that happened over a decade ago.
Over a decade ago. W met Moo when she was 4 or 5. He took her out a couple of times. His work is largely overseas but he was between contracts. They were in touch for 6 months or so before he went abroad again. He didn't keep in touch, so I lost my rag. Saw red. Sued him for maintenance - he'd never paid any before - didn't see why he should just let her down again.
Red. Lots of nasty stuff happened around that maintenance suit. Stuff Moo knows nothing about, and never needs to know about.
Blue. Turns out PH has got this address through BT.com - not that it makes much difference, but how can he be sure it's the right man? Also turns out he's discussed this with one of my oldest friends "some time ago". And she's never breathed a word of it to me.
Tumble. I can't believe that knowing all this, PH is proposing to send a 15 year old girl, alone and unsupported, to contact a man who has demonstrably decided he doesn't want her. "I think it's best if you don't involve your mother"
Shapeshift. Moo, at least, has the sense to tell me about it. To ask if I also have W's address. She would like to get in touch with him, but some day. Not necessarily now. I do have the address, as it happens. PH is insisting he has to give her his copy, so he does.
Tumble. I talk to Moo about adoption counselling. About how it's important that she has a safety net. That if W doesn't want to be in touch with her, we can shelter her from some of the pain of that. That it's also only fair to alert W if she's going to contact him, so his new life can be prepared for her. She agrees that when/if she's ready to contact W she'll do it through the BAAF. We find a website targetted at teenagers which has some really sensible discussions about all this stuff, and I bookmark it for her.
Red. And blue. I can't believe he's prepared to expose her to all that pain, simply to get at me; to push my buttons. I'm sure that's all it's about. He doesn't have direct access to me any more, so he has to use the children - witness the Daisy thing yesterday. And Dan telling me about how it's so dreadful they don't have any trainers at the moment...
Blue. How did I make such a fucking huge mistake? How did I expose my little girl to this man? I mean, ever? How could I? And how do I ever trust my judgement again? How do I know I'm not repeating these mistakes again?
Shapeshift. I *have* to choose to look at this positively, or I'll sink in it. Moo told me. She saw straight through him and came to me. She trusted me to help her through it. Thank you, god.
Tumble. One of my friends has a .sig file that says "I know the universe won't give me anything I can't handle. I just wish it didn't trust me so much". It used to be funny.
It's remarkably difficult to sleep in a kaleidoscope, you know.
Posted by Silver Lining on Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 03:40 PM in Kids' stuff, Mood, overview | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
slightly compelled to make some things clear, though this plainly crosses the line which distinguishes writing for myself from writing for whoever happens to be reading.
My last relationship was abusive - although it wasn't really until after it ended that I realised that. That's because it wasn't physically abusive; he never hit me. Even I would have noticed that that was inappropriate! I don't intend to go into much detail, partly because my children might stumble across this one day, and I firmly believe that there is stuff that they don't need to know; and partly because for me there isn't much mileage in going over and over it.
What's interesting for me now is the lessons I can learn from that relationship. I'm not taking the blame for what happened between us, it certainly was neither instigated nor welcomed by me. But I also acknowledge that I brought something to the party. There is something in me that made me choose a man like that - even knowing many of the underlying issues well in advance.
There is something in me that is passive, accepting, submissive even. But not in a consensual, chosen way. I don't look or behave much like the kind of person who would be trampled by self doubt. Indeed, much of the time I'm not that kind of person. But somewhere at the core of me is a lack of belief in my own self worth; a fear of causing anger and disapproval taken to almost ridiculous lengths; and hand in hand with that a willingness to do almost anything if it will lead to the freely given approval of another person. Particularly a male person.
In moderation, none of these things would be disastrous. Taken singly, they wouldn't perhaps be bad things, in their own right. But taken together and as expressions of some kind of deeply felt neediness, they have contributed time and again to my acceptance of unacceptable behaviour from another person. And they have encouraged me somehow to ally myself with men who are predisposed to taking advantage of those particular weaknesses.
I am not a victim - except of circumstances and environment, and in that respect I'm just the same as everybody else. I haven't known how to respect myself, or protect myself. These are things that it's difficult to learn as you rush towards middle age!
I have been rigorous in refusing to become bitter and embattled. I will not let what happened define me. I will not allow myself to become embroiled in battles of spite and pettiness. I don't want to look back in five years time and think this event has defined my life for any longer or in any greater depth than it absolutely needed to.
But I do want to look at myself; to observe my reactions to people and events; to learn and to analyse and to think. In an attempt to avoid finding myself in that position ever again!
I'm incredibly lucky - I have a very strong formal support network, and a group of wonderful friends. I prefer to acknowledge my progress in terms of celebrating where I am now, rather than looking back at where I started from.
I just don't want to find that people are thinking I'm something I'm not.
Posted by Silver Lining on Tuesday, January 25, 2005 at 05:04 AM in overview | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)